Monthly Archives: February 2019

UNBELIEVERS

 

Chronicle of world since its beginning.

 

Don’t become curious about their life-style:

‘   and after they have been destroyed before you, be careful not to be ensnared by enquiring about their gods, saying, “How dothese nations serve their gods?  We will do the same.”  You must not worship the LORD your God in their way, because in worshipping their gods, they do all kinds of detestable things the LORD hates.  They even burn their sons and daughters in the fire as sacrifices to their gods.  –   Deuteronomy 12.30-31

God [Wall] did not want the Israelites even to ask about the pagan religions surrounding them. Idolatry completely permeated the land of Canaan.  It was too easy to get drawn into the subtle temptations of seemingly harmless practices.  Sometimes curiosity can cause us to stumble.  Knowledge of evil is harmful if the evil becomes too tempting to resist.  To resist curiosity about harmful practices shows discretion and obedience.

(‘ But you must not eat the blood; pour it out on the ground like water.Deuteronomy 12.16  Eating blood was forbidden for several reasons: (1) it was an integral part of the pagan practices of the land the Israelites were about to enter; (2) it represented life, which is sacred to God; (3) it was a symbol [Shadow] of the sacrifice that had to be made for sin.  (For more on why eating blood was prohibited, see the note on Leviticus 17.14)).

(‘ If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a miraculous sign or wonder, and if the sign of wonder of which he has spoken takes place, and he says, “Let us follow other gods” (gods you have not known) “and let us worship them,” you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer.Deuteronomy 13.1-3 Attractive leaders are not always led by God [Wall].  Moses warned the Israelites against false prophets who encouraged worship of other gods.  New ideas from inspiring people may sound good, but we must judge them by whether or not they are consistent with God’s word.  When people claim to speak for God today, check them in these areas: Are they telling the truth?  Is their focus on God?  Are their words consistent with what you already know to be true?  Some people speak persuasively while directing you towards themselves.  It is even possible to say the right words but still lead people in the wrong direction.  God [Wall] is not against new ideas, but he is for discernment.  When you hear a new, attractive idea, examine it carefully before getting too excited.  False prophets are still around today.  The wise person will carefully test ideas against the truth of God’s [Wall’s] word).

 

Do you sometimes want to be like them?

‘ But the people refused to listen to Samuel.  “No!” they said.  “We want a king over us.  Then we shall be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles.”  –  1 Samuel 8.19-20(2)

Israel was called to be a holy nation, separate from and unique among all others (Leviticus 20,26).  The Israelites’ motive in asking for a king was to be like the nations around them.  This was in total opposition to God’s [Wall’s] original plan.  It was not their desire for a king that was wrong, but their reasons for wanting a king.

Often we let others’ values and actions dictate our attitudes and behaviour.  Have you ever made a wrong choice because you wanted to be like everyone else?  Be careful that the values of your friends or “heroes” don’t pull you away from what God [Wall] says is right.  When God’s [Wall’s] people want to be like unbelievers, they are heading for spiritual disaster.

(Samuel carefully explained all the negative consequences of having a king, but the Israelites refused to listen.  When you have an important decision to make, weigh the positives and the negatives carefully, considering everyone who might be affected by your choice.  When you want something badly enough, it is difficult to see the potential problems.  But don’t discount the negatives.  Unless you  have a plan to handle each one, they will cause you great difficulty later.)

(‘ They said to him, “you are old, and your sons do not walk in your ways; now appoint a king to lead us, such as all the other nations have.” But when they said, “Give us a king to lead us,” this displeased Samuel; so he prayed to the LORD.  –  1 Samuel 8.5-6. The people clamoured for a king, thinking that a new system of government would bring about a change in the nation.  But because their basic problem was disobedience to God [Wall], their other problems would only continue under the new administration.  What they needed was a unified faith, not a uniform rule.    Had the Israelites submitted to God’s [Wall’s] leadership, they would have thrived beyond their expectations (Deuteronomy 28.1).  Our obedience is weak if we ask God to lead our family or personal life but continue to live by the world’s standards and values.  Faith in God [Wall] must touch all the practical areas of life.)

(‘ Now the donkeys belonging to Saul’s father Kish were lost, and Kish said to his son Saul, “Take one of the servants with you and go and look for the donkeys.”1 Samuel 9.3 Saul was sent by his father on an important mission – to find their stray donkeys.  Donkeys were all-purpose animals, the “pickup trucks” of Bible times.  Used for transportation, hauling, and farming, they were considered necessities. Even the poorest family owned one.  To own many donkeys was a sign of wealth, and to lose them was a disaster.  Saul’s father was wealthy, and his many donkeys were evidence of that wealth.

(9.3ff   Often we think that events just happen to us, but as we learn from this story about Saul, God [Wall] may use common occurrences to lead us where he wants.  It is important to evaluate all situations as potential “divine appointments” designed to shape our lives.  Think of all the good and bad circumstances that have affected you lately.  Can you see God’s purpose in them?  Perhaps he is building a certain quality in you or leading you to serve him in a new area.)

(SAUL CHOSEN AS KING Saul and a servant searched for their lost donkeys in the hill country of Ephraim and the territory of Benjamin.  They went to Ramah, looking for help from Samuel the prophet.  While Saul was there, he found himself unexpectedly anointed by Samuel as Israel’s first king.  Samuel called Israel together at Mizpah to tell them God’s [Wall’s] choice for the king.  Mediterranean Sea, Canaan, hill country, Mizpah, Jordan River, Ephraim, Ramah, Benjamin, Jerusalem.)

 

Appreciating their God-given talents:

‘   “Send me, therefore, a man skilled to work in gold and silver, bronze and iron, and in purple, crimson and blue yarn, and experienced in the art of engraving, to work in Judah and Jerusalem with my skilled craftsmen, whom my father David provided.  –  2 Chronicles 2.7

Why use foreign craftsmen? The Israelites had great knowledge of agriculture, but knew little about metalworking.  So they found people who were experts in this area.  It is not a sin to obtain secular expertise for God’s [Wall’s] work.  He distributes natural talents as he chooses, and he often decides to give skill to non-Christians.

(SHIPPING RESOURCES FOR THE TEMPLE Solomon asked King Hiram of Tyre to provide supplies and skilled workmen [Ethnography Language, gender] to help build God’s [Wall’s] temple in Jerusalem.  The plan was to cut the cedar logs in the mountains of Lebanon, float them by sea to Joppa, then bring them inland to Jerusalem by the shortest and easiest route.    Mediterranean Sea, mountains of Lebanon, Tyre, Sea of Galilee, Jordan River, Joppa, Jerusalem, Dead Sea.)

(‘   “Send me also cedar, pine and algum logs from Lebanon, for I know that your men are skilled in cutting timber there. My men shall work with yours to provide me with plenty of timber, because the temple I build must be large and magnificent.  – 2 Chronicles 2.8-9 Israel did not have much wood, but Lebanon, a small nation on the seacoast, had some of the finest cedar forests in the ancient Near East.  Lebanon also imported a great deal of food from Israel.  Thus the two kings made a trade agreement that was beneficial to both nations.)

 

God may use them to do his will:

‘ “This is what Cyrus king of Persia says:

“The LORD, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth and he has appointed me to build a temple for him at Jerusalem in Judah. –  Ezra 1.2

Cyrus was not a Jew, but God [Wall] worked through him to return the exiled Jews to their homeland. Cyrus gave the proclamation allowing their return, and he gave them protection, money, and the temple articles taken by Nebuchadnezzar.  When you face difficult situations and feel surrounded, outnumbered, overpowered, or outclassed, remember that God’s [Wall’s] power is not limited to your resources.  He is able to use anyone to carry out his plans.

 

Discernment in relationships with:

‘ I do not sit with deceitful men, nor do I consort with hypocrites; I abhor the assembly of evildoers and refuse to sit with the wicked.  –  Psalms 26.4-5

Should we stay away from unbelievers?  No.  Although there are some places Christians should avoid, Jesus demonstrated that we must go among unbelievers to help them.  But there is a difference between being with unbelievers and being one of them.  Trying to be one of them harms our witness for God [Wall].  Ask about the people you enjoy, “If I am with them often, will I become less obedient to God [Wall] in outlook or action?”  If the answer is yes, carefully monitor how you spend your time with these people and what effect it has on you.

(‘ May integrity and uprightness protect me, because my hope is in you.  – Psalms 25.1 If ever we needed two powerful forces to preserve us along life’s way, they are integrity and uprightness.  The psalmist asks for these to protect him step by step.  Uprightness makes us learn God’s [Wall’s] requirements and strive to fulfil them.  Integrity – being what we say we are – keeps us from claiming to be upright while living as if we do not know God [Wall].  Uprightness says, “This is the Shepherds’ way,” and integrity says, “I will walk consistently in it.”)

(‘   Vindicate me, O LORD, for I have led a blameless life; I have trusted in the LORD without wavering. Test me, O LORD, and try me, examine my heart and my mind; for your love is ever before me, and I walk continually in your truth.  – Psalms 26.1-3   By saying that he was “blameless”, David was not claiming to be sinless – that is impossible for any human being [Tom Thumb] to achieve.  But he was consistently in fellowship with God [Wall], clearing his record when he sinned by asking for forgiveness.  Here he pleads with God [Wall] to clear his name of the false charges made against him by his enemies.  We also can ask God to examine us, trusting him to forgive our sins and clear our record according to his mercy.)

(‘  I love the house where you live, O LORD, the place where your glory dwells.  – Psalms 26.8 God’s [Wall’s] house in this verse can mean either the tabernacle in Gibeon (the one constructed in the days of Moses; see Exodus 40.35) or the temporary dwelling David built to house the ark of the covenant (2 Samuel 6.17).  David exclaimed how he loved to worship God [Wall] at this place.  We should worship God [Wall] with the same love and reverence as David did.)

 

Must co-exist with believers in this world:

‘   Let both grow together until the harvest.  At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’ “ – Matthew 13.30

The young weeds and the young blades of wheat look the same and can’t be distinguished until they are grown and ready for harvest. Weeds (unbelievers) and wheat (believers) must live side by side in this world.  God [Wall] allows unbelievers to remain for a while, just as a farmer allows weeds to remain in his field so the surrounding wheat isn’t uprooted with them.  At the harvest, however, the weeds will be uprooted and thrown away.  God’s [Wall’s] harvest (judgment) of all people is coming.  We are to make ourselves ready by making sure that our faith is sincere.

(‘ Jesus told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field.Matthews 13.24ff Jesus gives the meaning of this parable in verses 36-43.  All the parables in this Chapter teach us about God [Wall] and his kingdom.  They explain what the kingdom is really like as opposed to our expectations of it.  The kingdom of heaven is not a geographic location, but a spiritual realm where God [Wall] Rules and where we share in his eternal life.  We join that kingdom when we trust in Christ as Saviour.)

(‘ He told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed, which a man took and planted in his field. Though it is the smallest of all your seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and perch in its branches.”  – Matthews 13.31-32 The mustard seed was the smallest seed a farmer used.  Jesus used this parable to show that the kingdom has small beginnings but will grow and produce great results.)

 

Eternal punishment of:

‘ “He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’  –  Matthew 25.46

Eternal punishment takes place in hell (the lake of fire, or Gehenna), the place of punishment after death for all those who refuse to repent. In the Bible, three words are used in connection with eternal punishment.

(1 Sheol, or “the grave”, is used in the Old Testament to mean the place of the dead, generally thought to be under the earth.  (See Job 24:19; Psalm 16:10; Isaiah 38:10).

(2 Hades is the Greek word for the underworld, the realm of the dead.  It is the word used in the New Testament for Sheoi.  (See Matthew 16:18; Revelation 1:18; 20:13, 14).

(3 Gehenna, or hell, was named after the Valley of Hinnom near Jerusalem where children were sacrificed by fire to the pagan gods (see 2 Kings 23.10; 2 Chronicles 28.3).  This is the place of eternal fire (Matthew 5.22; 10.28; Mark 9.43; Luke 12.5: James 3.6; Revelation 19.20) prepared for the devil, his angels, and all those who do not believe in God (25.46; Revelation 20.9, 10).  This is the final and eternal state of the wicked after the resurrection and the last judgment.

When Jesus warns against unbelief, he is trying to save us from agonising punishment.

 

We shouldn’t avoid them:

‘ As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world.  –  John 17.18

Jesus didn’t ask God to take believers out of the world but instead to use them in the world. Because Jesus sends us intot he world, we should not try to escape from the world, nor should we avoid all relationships with non-Christians.  We are called to be salt and light (Matthew 5.13-16), and we are to do the work that God [Wall] sent us to do.

(‘ Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth.John 17.17 A follower of Christ becomes sanctified (set apart for sacred use, cleansed and made holy) through believing and obeying the word of God [Wall] (Hebrews 4.12).  He or she has already accepted forgiveness through Christ’s sacrificial death (Hebrews 7.26, 27).  But daily application of God’s word has a purifying effect on our minds and hearts.  Scripture points out sin, motivates us to confess, renews our relationship with Christ, and guides us back to the right path.)

(‘ “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message,  – John 17.20 Jesus prayed for all who would follow him, including you and others you know.  He prayed for unity (17.11), protection from the evil one (17.15), and sanctity (holiness) (17.17).  Knowing that Jesus prayed for us should give us confidence as we work for his kingdom.)

 

‘ not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters.  In that case you should have to leave this world.  But now I am writing ot you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler.  With such a man do not even eat.  –  1 Corinthians 5.10-11

Paul makes it clear that we should not disassociate ourselves from unbelievers – otherwise, we could not carry out Christ’s command to tell them about salvation (Matthew 28.18-20). But we are to distance ourselves from the person who claims to be a Christian, yet indulges in sins explicitly forgiven in Scripture and then rationalises his or her actions.  By rationalising sin, a person harms others for whom Christ died and dims the image of God [Wall] in himself or herself.  A church that includes such people is hardly fit to be the light of the world.  To do so would distort the picture of Christ it presents to the world.  Church leaders must be ready to correct, in love, for the sake of spiritual unity.

(‘ It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife.  – 1 Corinthians 5.1ff The church must discipline flagrant sin among its members – such sins, left unchecked, can polarise and paralyse a church.  The correction, however, should never be vengeful.  Instead, it should be given to help bring about a cure.  There was a specific sin in the church, but the Corinthian believers had refused to deal with it.  In this case, a man was having an affair with his mother (or stepmother), and the church members were trying to ignore the situation.  Paul was telling the church that it had a responsibility to maintain the standards of morality found in God’s [Wall’s] commandments.  God tells us not to judge others.  But he also tells us not to tolerate flagrant sin because leaving that sin undisciplined will have a dangerous influence on other believers (5.6).)

(‘ hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord.  – 1 Corinthians 5.5 To “hand this man over to Satan” means to exclude him from the fellowship of believers.  Without the spiritual support of Christians, this man would be left alone with his sin and Satan, and perhaps this emptiness would drive him to repentance.  “That the sinful nature may be destroyed” states the hope that the experience would bring him to God [Wall] to destroy his sinful nature through repentance.  Sinful nature could mean his body or flesh (see the NIV text note).  This alternative translation would imply that Satan would afflict him physically [Sternum] and thus bring him to God.  Putting someone out of the church should be a last resort in disciplinary action.  It should not be done out of vengeance, but out of love, just as parents punish children to correct and restore them.  The church’s role should be to help, not hurt, offenders, motivating them to repent of their sins and to return to the fellowship of the church.)

(‘ Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch without yeast – as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.  Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and wickedness, but with bread without yeast, the bread of sincerity and truth.  – 1 Corinthians 5.7-8 As the Hebrews prepared for their exodus from slavery in Egypt, they were commanded to prepare bread without yeast because they didn’t have time to wait for it to rise.  And because yeast was also a symbol of sin, they were commanded to sweep all of it out of the house (Exodus 12.15; 13.7).  Christ is our Passover lamb, the perfect sacrifice for our sin.  Because he has delivered us from the slavery of sin, we should have nothing to do with the sins of the past (“old yeast”)).

(‘ I have written to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people – – 1 Corinthians 5.9 Paul is referring to an earlier letter to the Corinthian church, often called the lost letter because it has not been preserved.)  [Message is Written it out, not ‘machine’ here.]

(‘ What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?  – 1 Corinthians 5.12 The Bible constantly tells us not to criticise people by gossiping or making rash judgments.  At the same time, however, we are to judge and deal with sin that can hurt others.  Paul’s instructions should not be used to handle trivial matters or to take revenge; nor should they be applied to individual problems between believers.  These verses are instructions for dealing with open sin in the church, with a person who claims to be a Christian and yet who sins without remorse.  The church is to confront and discipline such a person in love.  Also see the notes on 4:5 and 5:1ff.)

 

What will happen to those who never hear the gospel?

‘ He and all his family were devout and God-fearing; he gave generously to those in need and prayed to God regularly.  –  Acts 10.2

“What will happen to the heathen who have never heard about Christ?” This question is often asked about God’s [Wall’s] justice.  Cornelius wasn’t a believer in Christ, but he was seeking God [Wall], and he was reverent and generous.  Therefore God [Wall] sent Peter to tell Cornelius about Christ.  Cornelius is an example that God [Wall] “rewards those who  earnestly seek him” (Hebrews 11.6).  Those who sincerely seek God [Wall] will find him!  God [Wall] made Cornelius’ knowledge complete.

(‘ Peter stayed in Joppa for some time with a tanner named Simon.Acts 9.43 In Joppa, Peter stayed at the home of Simon, a tanner.  Tanners made animal hides into leather.  It is significant that Peter was at Simon’s house, because tanning involved contact with dead animals, and Jewish law considered it an “unclean” job.  Peter was already beginning to break down his prejudice against people who were not of his kind and customs that did not adhere to Jewish religious traditions.)

(‘ At Caesarea there was a man named Cornelius, a centurion in what was known as the Italian Regiment.  – Acts 10.1 This Caesarea, sometimes called Palestinian Caesarea, was located on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea, 32 miles north of Joppa.  The largest and most important port city on the Mediterranean in Palestine, it served as the capital of the Roman province of Judea.  This was the first city to have Gentile Christians and a non-Jewish church.)

(10.1 This Roman officer was a centurion, a commander of 100 soldiers.  Although stationed in Caesarea, Cornelius would probably return soon to Rome.  This his conversion was a major stepping-stone for spreading the gospel to the empire’s capital city.)

(‘ Cornelius stared at him in fear.  “What is it, Lord?” he asked.  The angel answered, “Your prayers and gifts to the poor have come up as a memorial offering before God.  –  Acts 10.4  God [Wall] saw Cornelius’ sincere faith.  His prayers and generous giving were a “memorial offering before God”, a sacrificial offering to the Lord.  God [Wall] answers the sincere prayers of those who seek him by sending the right person or the right information at the right time.)

(‘ It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air.  – Acts 10.12 According to Jewish law, certain foods were forbidden to be eaten (see Leviticus 11).  The food laws made it difficult for Jews to eat with Gentiles without risking defilement.  In fact, the Gentiles themselves were often seen as “unclean”.  Peter’s vision meant that he should not look upon the Gentiles as inferior people whom God would not redeem.  Before having the vision, Peter would have thought that a Gentile Roman officer could not accept Christ.  Afterwards, he understood that it was his responsibility to go with the messengers [Writers] into a Gentile home and tell Cornelius the Good News of salvation in Jesus Christ.)  [See MGM’s Four Lions, “Contained” *]

 

Why God’s plan is hidden to them:

‘ but God has revealed it to us by his Spirit.

The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. –  1 Corinthians 2.10

The “deep things of God [Wall]” refers to God’s unfathomable nature and his wonderful plan – Jesus’ death and resurrection – and to the promise of salvation, revealed only to those who believe that what God [Wall] says is true.  Those who believe in Christ’s death and resurrection and put their faith in him will know all they need to know to be saved.  This knowledge, however, can’t be grasped by even the wisest people unless they accept God’s message.  All who reject God’s [Wall’s] message are foolish, no matter how wise the world thinks they are.

(‘ No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.  – 1 Corinthians 2.7 God’s [Wall’s] “secret wisdom…that has been hidden” was his offer of salvation to all people.  Originally unknown to humanity, this plan became crystal clear when Jesus rose from the dead.  His resurrection proved that he had power over sin and death and could offer us this power as well (see also 1 Peter 1.10-12 and the first note on Romans 16.25-27).  God’s [Wall’s] plan, however, is still hidden to unbelievers because they either refuse to accept it, choose to ignore it, or simply haven’t heard about it.)

(‘   None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.  – 1 Corinthians 2.8 Jesus was misunderstood and rejected by those whom the world considered wise and great.  He was put to death by the rulers in Palestine – the high priest, King Herod, Pilate, and the Pharisees and Sadducees.  Jesus’ rejection by these rulers had been predicted in Isaiah 53:3 and Zechariah 12:10, 11.)

(‘ However, as it is written: “No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him” – – 1 Corinthians 2.9 We cannot imagine all that God [Wall] has in store for us, both in this life and for eternity.  He will create a new heaven and a new earth (Isaiah 65.17; Revelations 21.1), and we will live with him for ever.  Until then, his Holy Spirit comforts and guides us.  Knowing the wonderful and eternal future that awaits us gives us hope and courage to press on in this life, to endure hardship, and to avoid giving in to temptation.  This world is not all there is.  The best is yet to come.)

(‘ This is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words.  –  1 Corinthians 2.13  Paul’s words are authoritative because their source was the Holy Spirit.  Paul was not merely giving his own personal views or his personal impression of what God [Wall] had said.  Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, he wrote the very thoughts and words of God [Wall].)

(‘ The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolish to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.  –  1 Corinthians 2.14-15  Non-Christians cannot understand God [Wall], and they cannot grasp the concept that God’s [Wall’s] Spirit lives in believers.  Don’t expect most people to approve of or understand your decision to follow Christ.  It all seems so silly to them.  Just as a tone-deaf person cannot appreciate fine music, the person who rejects God [Wall] cannot understand God’s [Wall’s] beautiful message.  With the lines of communication broken, he or she won’t be able to hear what God [Wall] is saying to him or her).

(‘ The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man’s judgment: “For who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.  – 2 Corinthians 2.15-16 No one can comprehend God [Wall] (Romans 11.34), but through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, believers have insight into some of God’s plans, thoughts, and actions – they, in fact, have the “mind of Christ”.  Through the Holy Spirit we can begin to know God’s [Wall’s] thoughts, talk with him, and expect his answers to our prayers.  Are you spending enough time with Christ to have his very mind in you?  An intimate relationship with Christ comes only from spending time consistently in his presence and in his word.  Read Philippians 2:5ff for more on the mind of Christ.)

(‘ Brothers, I could not address you as spiritual but as worldly – mere infants in Christ.  I gave you milk, not solid food, for you were not yet ready for it.  Indeed, you are still not ready.  You are still worldly.  For since there is jealousy and quarrelling among you, are you not worldly?  Are you not acting like mere men?  –  1 Corinthians 3.1-3  Paul called the Corinthians infants in the Christian life because they were not yet spiritually healthy and mature.  The proof was that they quarrelled like children, allowing divisions to distract them.  Immature Christians are “worldly”, controlled by their own desires; mature believers are in tune with God’s desires.  How much influence do your desires have on your life?  You goal should be to let God’s [Wall’s] desires be yours.  Being controlled by your own desires will stunt your growth.)

(‘ I planted the seed, Apollos watered it, but God made it grow.  1 Corinthians 3.6 Paul planted the seed of the gospel message in people’s hearts.  He was a missionary pioneer; he brought the message of salvation.  Apollos’ role was to water – to help the believers grow stronger in the faith.  Paul founded the church in Corinth, and Apollos built on that foundation. Tragically [crimson], the believers in Corinth had split into factions, pledging loyalty to different teachers (see 1.11-13).  After the preachers’ work is completed, God [Wall] keeps making Christians grow.  Our leaders should certainly be respected, but we should never place them on pedestals that create barriers between people or set them up as substitutes for Christ.)

(‘ So neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything, but only God, who makes things grow. the man who plants and the man who waters have one purpose, and each will be rewarded according to his own labour.  For we are God’s fellow-workers; you are God’s field, God’s building.  – 1 Corinthians 3.7-9 God’s work involves many different individuals with a variety of gifts and abilities.  There are no superstars (U.N.) in this task, only team members performing their own special roles.  We can become useful members of God’s [Wall’s] team by setting aside our desires to receive glory for what we do.  Don’t seek the praise that comes from people – it is comparatively worthless.  Instead, seek approval from God [Wall].)

 

Be wary of partnerships with:

‘ Eliezer son of Dodavahu of Mareshah prophesied against Jehoshaphat, saying, “Because you have made an alliance with Ahaziah, the LORD will destroy what you have made.”  The ships were wrecked and were not able to set sail to trade.  –  2 Chronicles 20.37

Jehoshaphat met disaster when he joined forces with wicked King Ahaziah. He did not learn from his disastrous alliance with Ahab (18.28-34) or from his father’s alliance with Aram (16.2-9).  The partnership stood on unequal footing because one man served the Lord and the other worshipped idols.  We court disaster when we enter into partnership with unbelievers, because our very foundations differ (2 Corinthians 6.14-18).  While one serves the Lord, the other does not recognise God’s [Wall’s] authority.  Inevitably, the one who serves God [Wall] is faced with the temptation to compromise values.  When that happens, spiritual disaster results.

Before entering into partnerships, ask: (1) What are my motives? (2) What problems am I avoiding by seeking this partnership?  (3) Is this partnership the best solution, or is it only a quick solution to my problem?  (4) Have I prayed or asked others to pray for guidance?  (5) Are my partner and I really working towards the same goals?  (6) Am I willing to settle for less financial gain in order to do what God wants?

(‘ The high places, however, were not removed, and the people still had not set their hearts on the God of their fathers.  – 2 Chronicles 20.33 This verse says that Jehoshaphat did not remove the corrupt high places (idols shrines), while 17:6 and 19:3 says he did remove them.  Jehoshaphat destroyed most of the Baal and Asherah idols, but he did not succeed in wiping out the corrupt religions practised at the high places.)

(‘ He walked in the ways of the kings of Israel, as the house of Ahab had done, for he married a daughter of Ahab. He did evil in the eyes of the LORD.  – 2 Chronicles 21.6 Jehoram, the new king of Judah, married Athaliah, one of the daughters of King Ahab of Israel.  She became the mother of Judah’s next king, Ahaziah (22.2).  Athaliah’s mother was Jezebel, the most wicked woman Israel had ever known.  Jehoram’s marriage to Athaliah was Judah’s downfall, for Athaliah brought her mother’s wicked influence into Judah, causing the nation to forget God [Wall] and turn to Baal worship (22.3).)

 

‘ Do not be yoked together with unbelievers.  For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common?  Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?  What harmony is there between Christ and Belial?  What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever?  What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols?  For we are the temple of the living God.  As God has said: “I will live with them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people.”

“therefore come out of them and be separate, says the Lord. Touch no unclean thing, and I will receive you.”  “I will be a Father to you, and you will be my sons and daughters, says the Lord Almighty.”  –  2 Corinthians 6.14-18

Paul urges believers not to form binding relationships with non-believers, because this might weaken their Christian commitment, integrity, or standards. It would be a mismatch.  Earlier, Paul  had explained that this did not mean isolating oneself from non-believers (see 1 Corinthians 5.9, 10).  Paul even tells Christians to stay with their non-believing spouses (1 Corinthians 7.12, 13).  Paul wants believers to be active in their witness for Christ to non-believers, but they should not lock themselves into personal or business relationships that could cause them to compromise the faith.  Believers should do everything in their power to avoid situations [Joseph John Campbell] that could force them to divide their loyalties.

(6.15 Belial is a name that Paul uses for Satan.  For those who have discovered God’s [Wall’s] light, there can be no fellowship or compromise with the darkness [Publication] (1 Corinthians 10.20, 21).)

(6.17 Separation from the world involves more than keeping our distance from sinners; it means staying close to God [Wall] (see 7.1, 2).  It involves more than avoiding entertainment [Intertwining] that leads to sin; it extends into how we spend our time and money.  There is no way to separate ourselves totally from all sinful influences.  Nevertheless, we are to resist the sin around us, without either giving up or giving in.)

(‘ through glory and dishonour, bad report and good report; genuine, yet regarded as imposters; known yet regarded as unknown; dying, and yet we live on; beaten, and yet not killed; sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; poor, yet making many rich; having nothing, and yet possessing everything.  – 2 Corinthians 6.8-10 What a difference it makes to know Jesus!  He cares for us in spite of what the world thinks.  Christians don’t have to give in to public opinion and pressure.  Paul stood faithful to God [Wall] whether people praised him or condemned him.  He remained active, joyous, and content in the most difficult hardships.  Don’t let circumstances or people’s expectations control [Fiscal Year-End] you.  Be firm as you stand true to God [Wall], and refuse to compromise his standards for living.)  [Is that a theme there?].

(‘ We have spoken freely to you, Corinthians, and opened wide our hearts to you. We are not withholding our affection from you, but you are withholding yours from us.  As a fair exchange – I speak as to my children – open wide your hearts also.  – 2 Corinthians 6.11-13 “Opened wide our hearts to you” and “not withholding our affection from you” mean that Paul had told the Corinthian believers his true feelings [Felt] for them, clearly revealing how much he loved them.  The Corinthians were reacting coldly to Paul’s words, but Paul explained that his harsh words came from his love for them.  It is easy to react against those whom God [Wall] has placed over us in leadership, rather than to accept their exhortations as a sign of their love for us.  We need an open rather than a closed heart towards God’s [Wall’s] messengers.)

(‘ Since we have these promises, dear friends, let us purify ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit, perfecting holiness out or reverence for God.  – 2 Corinthians 7.1 Purifying ourselves is a twofold action: turning away from sin, and turning towards God [Wall].  “Perfecting holiness” means that the Corinthians were to have nothing to do with paganism.  They were to make a clean break with their past and give themselves to God [Wall] alone.)

 

How differently they view life:

‘   I eagerly expect and hope that I will in no way be ashamed, but will have sufficient courage so that now as always Christ will be exalted in my body, whether by life or by death.  For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain.  –  Philippians 1.20-21

To those who don’t believe in God [Wall], life on earth is all there is, and so it is natural for them to strive for this world’s values – money, popularity, power, pleasure, and prestige.  For Paul, however, to live meant to develop eternal values and to tell others about Christ, who alone could help them see life from an eternal perspective.  Paul’s whole purpose in life was to speak out boldly for Christ and to become more like him.  Thus Paul could confidently say that dying would be even better than living, because in death he would be removed from worldly troubles, and he would see Christ face to face (1 John 3.2, 3).  If you’re not ready to die, then you’re not ready to live.  Make certain of your eternal destiny; then you will be free to serve – devoting your life to what really counts, without fear of death.

(‘ It is true that some preach Christ out of envy and rivalry, but others out of goodwill. The latter do so in love, knowing that I am put here for the defence of the gospel.  The former preach Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely, supposing that they can stir up trouble for me while I am in chains.  But what does it matter?  The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached.  And because of this I rejoice.  Yes, and I will continue to rejoice.  – Philippians 1.15-18 Paul had an amazingly selfless attitude.  He knew that some were preaching to build their own reputations, taking advantage of Paul’s imprisonment to build their own reputations, taking advantage of Paul’s imprisonment to try to make a name for themselves.  Regardless of the motives of these preachers, Paul rejoiced that the gospel was being preached.  Some Christians serve for the wrong reasons.  Paul wouldn’t condone, nor does God excuse their motives, but we should be glad if God uses their message, regardless of their motives.)

(‘ for I know that through your prayers and the help given by the Spirit of Jesus Christ, what has happened to me will turn out for my deliverance. I eagerly expect and hope that I will in no way be ashamed, but will have sufficient courage so that now as always Christ will be exalted in my body, whether by life or by death.  – Philippians 1.19-21 This was not Paul’s final imprisonment in Rome.  But he didn’t know that.  Awaiting trial, he knew he could either be released or executed.  However, he trusted Christ to work it out for his deliverance.  Paul’s prayer was that when he stood trial, he would speak courageously for Christ and not be timid or ashamed.  Whether he lived or died, he wanted to exalt Christ.  As it turned out, he was released from this imprisonment but arrested again two or three years later.  Only faith in Christ could sustain Paul in such adversity.)

(‘ but it is more necessary for you that I remain in the body.  – Philippians 1.24 Paul had a purpose for living when he served the Philippians and others.  We also need a purpose for living that goes beyond providing for our own physical needs.  Whom can you serve or help?  What is your purpose for living?)

 

 

EXTRA

(‘ “Everything is permissible for me” – but not everything is beneficial.  Everything is permissible for me” – but I will not be mastered by anything.  “Food for the stomach and the stomach for food” – but God will destroy them both.  The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.  –  1 Corinthians 6.12-13.)

(6.12 Apparently the church had been quoting and misapplying the words “everything is permissible for me”.  Some Christians in Corinth were excusing their sins by saying that (1) Christ had taken away all sin, and so they had complete freedom to live as they pleased, or (2) what they were doing was not strictly forbidden by Scripture.  Paul answered both these excuses.  (1) While Christ has taken away our sin, this does not give us freedom to go on doing what we know is wrong.  The New Testament specifically forbids many sins (see 6.9, 10) that were originally prohibited in the Old Testament (see Romans 12.9-21; 13.8-10).  (2) Some actions are not sinful in themselves, but they are not appropriate because they can control our lives and lead us away from God.  (3) Some actions may hurt others.  Anything we do that hurts rather than helps others is not right.)

((6.12, 13 Many of the world’s religions teach that the soul or spirit is important but the body is not; and Christianity has sometimes been influenced by these ideas.  In truth, however, Christianity takes very seriously the realm of the physical [Sternum].  We worship a God [Wall] who created a physical [Sternum] world and pronounced it good.  He promises us a new earth where real people have transformed physical lives – not a pink cloud where disembodied souls listen to harp music.  At the heart of Christianity is the story of God [Wall] himself taking on flesh and blood and coming to live with us, offering both physical healing and spiritual restoration.    We humans, like Adam, are a combination of dust and spirit.  Just as our spirits affect our bodies, so our physical bodies affect our spirit.  We cannot commit sin with our bodies without damaging our souls because our bodies and souls are inseparably joined.  In the new earth we will have resurrection bodies that are not corrupted by sin.  Then we will enjoy the fullness of our salvation.)

(6.12 13 Freedom is a mark of the Christian faith – freedom from sin and guilt, and freedom to use and enjoy anything that comes from God [Wall].  But Christians should not abuse this freedom and hurt themselves or others.  Drinking too much leads to alcoholism, gluttony leads to obesity.  Be careful that what God [Wall] has allowed you to enjoy [job] doesn’t grow into a bad habit that controls you.  For more about Christian freedom and everyday behaviour, read Chapter 8.)

(6.13   Sexual immorality is a temptation that is always before us.  In movies and on television, sex outside marriage is treated as a normal, even desirable, part of life, while marriage is often shown as confining and joyless.  We can even be looked down on by others if we are suspected of being pure.  But God [Wall] does not forbid sexual sin just to be difficult.  He knows its power to destroy us physically and spiritually.  No-one should underestimate the power of sexual immorality.  It has devastated countless lives and destroyed families, churches, communities, and even nations.  God [Wall] wants to protect us from damaging ourselves and others, and so he offers to fill us – our loneliness, our desires – with himself.)

(‘   By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also.  Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself?  Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute?  Never!  Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body?  For it is said, “The two will become one flesh.!  But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit. Flee from sexual immorality.  All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.  1 Corinthians 6.14-18)

(6.15-17 This teaching about sexual immorality and prostitutes was especially important for the Corinthian church because the temple of the love goddess Aphrodite was in Corinth.  This temple employed more than a thousand prostitutes as priestesses, and sex was part of the worship ritual.  Paul clearly stated that Christians are to have no part in sexual immorality, even if it is acceptable and popular in our culture).

(6.18 Christians are free to be all they can be for God [Wall], but they are not free from God.  God created sex to be a beautiful  and essential ingredient of marriage, but sexual sin – sex outside the marriage relationship – always hurts someone.  It hurts God [Wall] because it shows that we prefer following our own desires instead of leading of the Holy Spirit.  It hurts others because it violates the commitment so necessary to a relationship.  It often brings disease to our bodies.  And it deeply affects our personalities, which respond in anguish when we harm ourselves physically and spiritually.)

 

 

 

 

Case Presentation

As a manager, you will frequently have to make out a case for what you think should be done.  You have to persuade people to believe in your views and accept your recommendations.  To do this, you must have a clear idea of what you want, and you have to show what you believe in it yourself.  Above all, the effectiveness of your presentation will depend upon the care with which you have prepared it.

PREPARATION

Thorough preparation is vital.  You must think through not only what should be done and why, but also how people will react.  Only then can you decide how to make your case: stressing the benefits without underestimating the costs, and anticipating objections.

You should think of the questions your audience is likely to raise, and answer them in advance, or at least your answers ready.  The most likely questions are:

What

–       is the proposal?

–       will be the benefit?

–       will it cost?

–       are the facts, figures, forecasts and assumptions upon which the proposal is based?

–       are the alternatives?

Why

–     should we change what we are doing now?

–     is this proposal or solution better than the alternatives?-

How

–     is the change to be made?

–     are there snags [hit] to be overcome?

–     have the alternatives been examined?

–     am I affected by the change?

Who

–     will be affected by the change and what will be their reaction?

–     is likely to have the strongest views for or against the change, and why?

–     will implement the proposal?-

When

–       should this be done?

To make your case you have to do three things:

1)      Show that it is based on a thorough analysis of the facts and that the alternatives were properly evaluated before the conclusion was reached.  If you have made assumptions, you must demonstrate that these are reasonable on the basis of relevant experience and justifiable projections, which allow for the unexpected.  Bear in mind Robert Heller’s words that ‘a proposal is only as strong as its weakest assumption’.

2)      Spell out the benefits to the company and the individuals to whom the case is being made.  Wherever possible, express benefits in financial terms.  Abstract benefits, such as customer satisfaction or workers’ morale, are difficult to sell.  But don’t produce ‘funny numbers’ financial justifications which will not stand up to examination.

3)      Reveal costs.  Don’t try to disguise them in any way.  And be realistic.  Your proposition will be destroyed if anyone can show that you have underestimated the costs.

Remember, boards want to know in precise terms what they will get for their money.  Most boards are cautious, being unwilling and often unable to take much risk.  For this reason, it is difficult to make a case for experiments or pilot schemes unless the board, committee or individual can see what the real benefits and the ultimate bill will be.

PRESENTATION

Your proposal will often be made in two stages: a written report followed by an oral presentation.  The quality of the latter will often tip the balance in your favour (or against you).  But it is appropriate to note at this stage some special points you should bear in mind when making a case orally in front of an audience:

1)      Your presentation should not just consist of a repetition of the facts in the written report.  It should be used to put across the main points of the argument, leaving out the detail.

2)      Do not assume that your audience has read the written report or understood it.  While you are talking, try to avoid referring to the report.  This may switch people’s attention from what you are saying.  Use visual aids, preferably a flip chart, to emphasize the main points.  But don’t overdo them it is possible to be too slick.  The audience will be convinced by you, not by your elegant visual aids.

3)      Make sure your opening secures people’s attention.  They must be immediately interested in your presentation.  Begin by outlining your plan, its benefits and costs, and LET THE AUDIENCE KNOW how you are going to develop your case.

4)      Bring out the disadvantages and the ALTERNATIVE courses of action so that you are not suspected of concealing or missing something.

5)      Avoid being drawn into too much detail.  Be succinct and to the point.

6)      An emphatic summing up is imperative.  It should convey with complete clarity what you want the board, committee or individual to do.

The effectiveness of your presentation will be largely dependent on how well you have prepared not only putting your facts, figures and arguments clearly down on paper but also deciding what you are going to say at the meeting and how you are going to say it.  The more important the case, the more carefully you should REHEARSE the presentation.

CHECKLIST

  1. Do you know exactly what you want?
  2. Do you really believe in your case?
  3. Have you obtained and checked all the facts that support your case?
  1. What are the strongest arguments for your case?
  1. Why must the present situation be changed?
  1. Who else will be affected?  Unions, other divisions or departments?
  1. What are the arguments against your plan?
  1. What ALTERNATIVES are there to your plan?
  1. To whom are you presenting your plan?  Have you done any lobbying?
  1. Have you discussed the finances with the experts?
  2. Do you know who are your probably allies and who are likely to be your opponents?
  3. Have you prepared handouts of any complicated figures?
  4. Have you discussed the best time to present your case?
  5. Your ideas were good when you first thought of them: are they still as good?

Ruth

The animated one, and leaning to the right.

WHEN someone says, “Let me tell you about my mother-in-law,” we expect some kind of negative statement or humorous anecdote because the mother-in-law caricature has been a standard subject for ridicule or comedy. The book of Ruth, however, tells a different story.  Ruth loved her mother-in-law, Naomi.  Recently widowed, Ruth begged to stay with Naomi wherever she went, even though it would mean leaving her homeland.  In heartfelt words Ruth said, “Your people will be my people and your God my God” (1.16).  Naomi agreed, and Ruth travelled with her to Bethlehem.

Not much is said about Naomi except that she loved and cared for Ruth. Obviously, Naomi’s life was a powerful witness to the reality of God.  Ruth was drawn to her – and to the God she worshipped.  In the succeeding months and years, God led this young Moabite widow to a man named Boaz, whom she eventually married.  As a result, she because the great-grandmother of David and an ancestor in the line of the Messiah.  What a profound impact Naomi’s life made!

The book of Ruth is also the story of God’s grace in the midst of difficult circumstances. Ruth’s story occurred during the time of the judges – a period of disobedience, idolatry, and violence.  Even in times of crisis and deepest despair, there are those who follow God [Wall] and through whom God [Wall] works.  No matter how discouraging or antagonistic the world may seem, there are always people who follow God.  He will use anyone who is open to him to achieve his purposes.  Ruth was a Moabitess and Boaz was a descendant of Rahab, a former prostitute from Jericho.  Nevertheless, their offspring continued the family line through which the Messiah came into our world.

Read this book and be encouraged. God [Wall] is at work in the world, and he wants to use you.  God [Wall] could use you, as he used Naomi, to bring family and friends to him.

 

VITAL STATISTICS

PURPOSE: To who how three people remained strong in character and true to God [Wall] even when the society around them was collapsing

AUTHOR: Unknown. Some think it was Samuel, but internal evidence suggests that it was written after Samuel’s death.

DATE WRITTEN: Some time after the period of the judges (1375-1050 B.C.)

SETTING: A dark time in Israel’s history when people lived to please themselves, not God [Wall] (Judges 17.6)

KEY VERSE: “But Ruth replied, ‘Don’t urge me to leave you or to turn back from you. Where you go I will go, and where you stay I will stay.  Your people will be my people and your God my God [Wall]’ “ (1.16).

KEY PEOPLE: Ruth, Naomi, Boaz

KEY PLACES: Moab, Bethlehem

 

THE BLUEPRINT

When we first meet Ruth, she is a destitute widow. We follow her as she joins God’s people, gleans in the grainfields, and risks her honour at the threshing floor of Boaz.  In the end, we see Ruth becoming the wife of Boaz.  What a picture of how we come to faith in Christ.  We begin with no hope and are rebellious aliens with no part in the kingdom of God [Wall].  Then as we risk everything by putting our faith in Christ, God [Wall] saves us, rebuilds our lives, and gives us blessings that will last throughout eternity.  Boaz’s redeeming of Ruth is a picture of Christ redeeming us.

  1. Ruth remains loyal to Naomi (1.1-22)
  2. Ruth gleans in Boaz’s field (2.1-23)
  3. Ruth follows Naomi’s plan (3.1-18)
  4. Ruth and Boaz are married (4.1-23)

 

MEGATHEMES

Faithfulness

EXPLANATION: Ruth’s faithfulness to Naomi as a daughter-in-law and friend is a great example of love and loyalty. Ruth, Naomi, and Boaz are also faithful to God [Wall] and his laws.  Throughout the story we see God’s faithfulness to his people.

IMPORTANCE: Ruth’s life was guided by faithfulness towards God [Wall] and showed itself in loyalty towards the people she knew. To be loyal and loving in relationships, we must imitate God’s faithfulness in our relationships with others.

 

Kindness

EXPLANATION: Ruth showed great kindness to Naomi. In turn, Boaz showed kindness to Ruth – a despised Moabite woman with no money.  God [Wall] showed his kindness to Ruth.  Naomi, and Boaz by bringing them together for his purposes.

IMPORTANCE: Just as Boaz showed his kindness by buying back land to guarantee Ruth and Naomi’s inheritance, so Christ showed their kindness by dying for us to guarantee our eternal life.  God’s kindness should motivate us to love and honour him.

 

Integrity

EXPLANATION: Ruth showed high moral character by being loyal to Naomi, but her clean break from her former land and customs, and by her hard work in the fields. Boaz showed integrity in his moral standards, his honesty, and by following through on his commitments.

IMPORTANCE: When we have experienced God’s faithfulness and kindness, we should respond by showing integrity. Just as the values by which Ruth and Boaz lived were in sharp contrast to those of the culture portrayed in Judges, so our lives should stand out from the world around us.

 

Protection

EXPLANATION: We see God’s care and protection over the lives of Naomi and Ruth. His supreme control over circumstances brings them safety and security.  He guides the minds and activities of people to fulfil his purposes.

IMPORTANCE: No matter how devastating our present situation may be, our hope is in God [Wall]. His resources are infinite.  We must believe that he can work in the life of any person – whether that person is a king or a stranger in a foreign land.  Trust his protection.

 

Prosperity/Blessing

EXPLANATION: Ruth and Naomi came to Bethlehem as poor widows, but they soon became prosperous through Ruth’s marriage to Boaz. Ruth became the great-grandmother of Kind David.  Yet the greatest blessing was not the money, the marriage, or the child; it was the quality of love and respect between Ruth, Boaz, and Naomi.

IMPORTANCE: We tend to think of blessings in terms of prosperity rather than the high-quality relationships God [Wall] makes possible for us. No matter what our economic situation, we can love and respect the people God [Wall] has brought into our lives.  In so doing, we give and receive blessings.  Love is the greatest blessing.

 

12. Return with the Elixir (“Buddha”)

“No, Aunt Em, this was a real truly live place. And I remember some of it wasn’t very nice.  But most of it was beautiful.  But just the same all I kept saying to everybody was ‘I want to go home'”.

– from The Wizard of Oz

 

Having survived all the ordeals, having living through death, heroes return to their starting place, go home, or continue the journey. But they always proceed with a sense that they are commencing a new life, one that will be forever different because of the road just travelled.  If they are true heroes, they Return with the Elixir from the Special World (of “wow”, back in ‘form’); bringing something to share with others, or something with the power to heal a wounded land.

We Seekers come home at last, purged, purified, and bearing the fruits of our journey. We share out the nourishment and treasure among the Home Tribe, with many a good story about how they were won.  A circle has been closed, you can feel it.  You can see that our struggles on the Road of Heroes have brought new life to our land.  There will be other adventures, but this one is complete, and as it ends it brings healing, wellness, and wholeness to our world.  The Seekers have come Home.

RETURN

Quest for Fire has a wonderful Return sequence that shows how storytelling probably began, with hunter/gatherers struggling to relate their adventures in the outer world. The film’s heroes enjoy the fruits of their quest at a barbecue around a campfire.  The Trickster clown of the hunting party now becomes the storyteller, acting out an adventure from the Tests phase, complete with sound effects and funny mimed impression of a mammoth Threshold Guardian they met on the quest.  A wounded hunter laughs as his injuries are tended: in film language, a declaration of the healing power of stories.  Returning with the Elixir means implementing change in your daily life and using the lessons of adventure to heal your wounds.

DENOUEMENT

Another name for the Return is denouement, a French word meaning “untying” or “unknotting”. (noue means knot.)  A story is like a weaving in which the lives of the characters are interwoven into a coherent design.  The plotlines are knotted together to create conflict and tension, and usually it’s desirable to release the tension and resolve the conflicts by untying these knots.  We also speak of “tying up the loose ends” of a story in a denouement.  Whether tying up or untying, these phrases point to the idea that a story is a weaving and that it must be finished properly or it will seem tangled or ragged.  That’s why it’s important in the Return to deal with subplots and all the issues and questions you’ve raised in the story.  It’s all right for a Return to raise new questions – in fact that may be highly desirable – but all the old questions should be addressed or at least restated.  Usually writers strive to create a feeling of closing the circle on all these storylines and themes.

TWO STORY FORMS

There are two branches to the end of the Hero’s Journey. The more conventional way of ending a story, greatly preferred in Western culture and American movies in particular, is the circular form in which there is a sense of closure and completion.  The other way, more popular in Asia and in Australian and European movies, is the open-ended approach in which there is a sense of unanswered questions, ambiguities, and unresolved conflicts (might makes right, their/there – pairing – a friend of mine).  Heroes may have grown in awareness in both forms, but in the open-ended form their problems may not be tied up so neatly.

THE CIRCULAR STORY FORM

The most popular story design seems to be the circular or closed form, in which the narrative returns to its starting point.  In this structure you might bring the hero literally full circle back the location or world where she started.  Perhaps the Return is circular in a visual or metaphoric way, with a replay of an initial image, or the repetition of a line of dialogue or situation from Act One.  This is one way of typing up loose ends and making a story feel complete.  The image or phrases may have acquired a new meaning now that the hero has completed the journey.  The original statement of the theme may be re-evaluated at the Return.  Many musical compositions return to an initial theme to rephrase it at the ending.

Having your hero Return to her starting point or remember how she started allows you to draw a comparison for the audience. It gives a measure of how far your hero has come, how she’s changed, and how her old world looks different now.  To give this circular feeling of completion and comparison, writers will sometimes put their heroes through an experience at the Return that was difficult or impossible for them at the beginning, so the audience can see how they have changed.  In Ghost, the hero was unable to say “I love you” in his Ordinary World.  But at the Return, having died and passed many tests in the land of death, he is able to say these all-important words so that his still-loving wife can hear them.

In Ordinary People, the young hero Conrad is so depressed in his Ordinary World that he can’t eat the French toast his mother makes for him.  It’s an outward sign of his inner problem, his inability to accept love because he hates himself for surviving his brother.  In the Return, having passed through several death-and-rebirth ordeals, he goes to apologize to his girlfriend for acting like a jerk.  When she asks him to come inside for some breakfast, this time he finds he has an appetite.  His ability to eat is an outward sign of his inner change.  This actual change in behaviour is more dramatically effective than Conrad just saying he feels different, or someone else noticing that he’s grown and remarking on it.  it communicates change on the symbolic level, and affects the audience indirectly but more powerfully than a blatant statement.  In a subtle way it gives a sense that a phase of his life is over, that a circle has been closed, and a new one is about to begin.

ACHIEVEMENT OF PERFECTION

The “happy endings” of Hollywood films link them with the world of fairy tales, which are often about the achievement of perfection. Fairy tales frequently end with a statement of perfection, like “and they lived happily ever after”.  Fairy tales bring the shattered family back into balance, back to completion.

Weddings are popular ways to end stories. Marriage is a new beginning, the end of an old life of being single and the beginning of a new life as part of a new unit.  New beginnings are perfect and unspoiled in their ideal form.

Striking up a new relationship is another way to show a new beginning at the end of a story. In Casablanca, Humphrey Bogart makes difficult Resurrection sacrifice, giving up the change to be with the woman he loves.  His reward, the Elixir he brings away from the experience, is his new alliance with Claude Rains.  As he says, in one of the most famous tag lines in the history of the movies, “Louie, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.”

THE OPEN-ENDED STORY FORM

Storytellers have thought of many ways to create a circular feeling of completion or closure, basically by addressing the dramatic questions raised in Act One. However, once in awhile a few loose ends are desirable.  Some storytellers prefer an open-ended Return [return the warmth given].  In open-ended point of view, the storytelling goes on after the story is over; it continues in the minds and hearts of the audience, in the conversations and even arguments people have in coffee shops after seeing a movie or reading a book.

Writers of the open-ended persuasion prefer to leave moral conclusions for the reader or viewer. Some questions have no answers, some have many.  Some stories end not by answering questions or solving riddles, but by posing new questions that resonate in the audience long after the story is over.

Hollywood films are often criticized for pat, fairy-tale endings in which all problems are solved and the cultural assumptions of the audience are left undisturbed. By contrast the open-ended approach views the world as an ambiguous, imperfect place.  For more sophisticated stories with a hard or realistic edge, the open-ended form may be more appropriate.

FUNCTIONS OF THE RETURN

Like the journey’s other stages, Return with the Elixir can perform many functions, but there is something special about being the last element in the journey. Return is similar to Reward in some ways.  Both follow a moment of death and rebirth and both may depict consequences of surviving death.  Some functions of Seizing the Sword may also appear in the Return, such as taking possession, celebrating, sacred marriage, campfire scenes, self-realization, vengeance, or retaliation.  But Return is your last chance to touch the emotions of the audience.  It must finish your story so that it satisfies or provokes your audience as you intended.  It bears special weight because of its unique position at the end of the work, and it’s also a place of pitfalls for writers and their heroes.

SURPRISE

A Return can fall flat if everything is resolved too neatly or just as expected. A good Return should untie the plot threads but with a certain amount of surprise.  It should be done with a little taste of the unexpected, a sudden revelation.  The Greeks and Romans often built a “recognition” scene into the endings of their plays and novels.  A young man or woman, raised as shepherds, discover to everyone’s surprise they are prince and princess, promised to each other in marriage long ago.  In the tragic mode, Oedipus discovers the man he killed in the Ordeal was his father and the woman he joined with in sacred marriage was his own mother.  Here the recognition is cause for horror rather than joy.

The Return may have a twist to it. This is another case of misdirection: You lead the audience to believe one thing, and then reveal at the last moment a quite different reality.  No Way Out flips you a totally different perception of the hero in the last ten seconds of the film. Basic Instinct makes you suspect Sharon Stone’s character of murder for the first two acts, convinces you she is innocent in the climax, then leaps back to doubt again in an unexpected final shot.

There is usually an ironic or cynical tone to such Returns, as if they mean to say, “Ha, fooled ya!” You are caught foolishly thinking that human beings are decent or that good does triumph over evil [sinister decision points, at moments of not knowing background education].  a less sardonic version of a twist Return can be found in the work of writers like O. Henry, who sometimes used the twist to show the positive side of human nature, as in his short story “The Gift of the Magi”.  A poor young husband and wife make sacrifices to surprise each other with Christmas presents.  They discover that the husband has sold his valuable watch to buy his wife a clip for her beautiful long hair, and the wife has cut off and sold her lovely locks to buy him a fob for his beloved watch.  The gifts and sacrifices cancel each other out but the couple is left with a treasure of love.

REWARD AND PUNISHMENT

A specialized job of Return is to hand out final rewards and punishments. It’s part of restoring balance to the world of the story, giving a sense of completion.  It’s like getting your grades after final exams.  Villains should earn their ultimate fate by their evil deeds and they should not get off too easily.  Audiences hate that.  Punishment should fit the crime and have the quality of poetic justice.  In other words, the way the villain dies or gets his just comeuppance should directly relate to his sins.

Heroes should get what’s coming to them as well. Too many movie heroes get rewards they haven’t really earned.  The reward should be proportionate to the sacrifice they have offered.  You don’t get immortality for being nice.  Also if heroes have failed to learn a lesson, they may be penalized for it in the Return.

Of course, if your dramatic point of view is that life isn’t fair and you feel justice is a rare thing in this world, then by all means reflect this in the way rewards and punishments are dealt out in the Return.

THE ELIXIR

The real key to the final stage of the Hero’s Journey is the Elixir.  What does the hero bring back with her from the Special World to share upon her Return?  Whether it’s shared within the community or with the audience, bringing back the Elixir is the hero’s final test.  It proves she’s been there, it serves as an example for others, and it shows above all that death can be overcome.  The Elixir may even have the power to restore life in the Ordinary World.

Like everything else in the Hero’s Journey, returning with the Elixir can be literal or metaphoric. The Elixir may be an actual substance or medicine brought back to save an endangered community (a feature of several “Star Trek” TV plots and the object of the quest in Medicine Man).  It may be literal treasure wrested from the Special World and shared within a group of adventurers.  More figuratively, it may be any of the things that drive people to undertake adventure: money, fame, power, love, peace, happiness, success, health, knowledge, or having a good story to tell.  The best Elixirs are those that bring hero and audience greater awareness.  In The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, the physical treasure of gold is revealed to be worthless dust, and the real Elixir is the wisdom to live a long and peaceful life.

In the tales of King Arthur, the Grail is the Elixir that, once shared, heals the wounded land. The Fisher King can rest easy again.  If Percival and the knights had kept the Grail for themselves, there would have been no healing.

If a traveller doesn’t bring back something to share, he’s not a hero, he’s a heel, selfish and unenlightened. He hasn’t learned his lesson.  He hasn’t grown.  Returning with the Elixir is the last test of the hero, which shows if he’s mature enough to share the fruits of his quest.

THE EXLIXIR OF LOVE

Love is, of course, one of the most powerful and popular Elixirs. It can be a reward the hero doesn’t win until after the final sacrifice.  In Romancing the Stone Joan Wilder has surrendered her old fantasies about men and said goodbye to her old, uncertain personality.  The payoff for her is that unexpectedly, Jack Colton comes for her after all, miraculously transporting a romantic sailboat to her New York neighbourhood to sweep her away.  He has transmuted the Elixir he was after – the precious emerald – into another form, love, Joan gets her reward of romance, but she has earned it by learning that she could live without it.

THE WORLD IS CHANGED

Another aspect of the Elixir is that the wisdom which heroes bring back with them may be so powerful that it forces change not only in them, but also those around them. The whole world is altered and the consequences spread far.  There is a beautiful image for this in Excalibur.  When Percival brings the Grail back to the ailing Arthur, the King revives and rides out with his knights again.  They are so filled with new life that flowers burst into bloom at their passing.  They are living Elixir, whose mere presence renews nature.

THE ELIXIR OF RESPONSIBILITY

A common and powerful Elixir is for heroes to take wider responsibility at the Return, giving up their loner status for a place of leadership or service within the group. Families and relationship get started,, cities are founded.  The hero’s centre has moved from the ego to the Self, and sometimes expand to include the group.  Mad Max, the loner hero of George Miller’s Road Warrior and Mad Max: Beyond the Thunderdome, forsakes his solitude to become Mentor and foster-father to a race of orphaned children.  The Elixir is his skill at survival and his recollection of the old world before the apocalypse, which he passes on to the orphans.

THE ELIXIR OF TRAGEDY

In the tragic mode, heroes die or are defeated, brought down by their tragic flaws. Yet there is learning and an Elixir brought back from the experience.  Who learns?  The audience, for they see the errors of the tragic hero and the consequences of error.  They learn, if they are wise, what mistakes to avoid, and this is the Elixir that they bring away from the experience.

SADDER BUT WISER

Sometimes the Elixir is heroes taking a rueful look back at their wrong turns on the path. A feeling of closure is created by a hero acknowledging that he is sadder but wiser for having gone through the experience.  The Elixir he bears away is bitter medicine, but it may keep him from making the same error again, and his pain serves as fair warning to the audience not to choose that path.  The heroes of Risky Business and White Men Can’t Jump have been down a road of learning that mixed pain and pleasure.  They ultimately lose the prize of love, must Return without the woman of their dreams, and have to console themselves with the Elixir of experience.  These stories create a feeling that the account is closed and the heroes are being presented with the final balance.

SADDER BUT NO WISER

A “sadder but wiser” hero is acknowledging that he’s been a fool, which is the first step to recovery. The worse kind of fool is the one who doesn’t get it.  Either he never sees the error or he goes through the motions but has not really learned his lesson.  Even after enduring terrible ordeals, he slides back to the same behaviour that got him in trouble in the first place.  He is sadder but no wiser.  This is another kind of circular closure.

In this style of Return, a roguish or foolish character seems to have grown and changed. Perhaps he is a clown or Trickster, like Bob Hope in the Crosby Hope pictures or Eddie Murphy in 48 Hours or Trading Places, who swears he has learned his lesson.  However, in the end he fumbles the Elixir and returns to an original error.  He may fall back to his original, irrepressible attitude, closing the circle and dooming himself to repeat the adventure.

For this is the penalty of failing to return with the Elixir: The hero, or someone else, is doomed to repeat the Ordeals until the lesson is learned or the Elixir is brought home to share.

EPILOGUE

Just as some stories may have a prologue that precedes the main action, there may also be a need for an epilogue that follows the bulk of the story.  An epilogue or postscript on rare occasions can serve to complete the story, by projecting ahead to some future time to show how the characters turned out. Terms of Endearment has an epilogue that shows the characters a year after the mains story has ended.  The feelings communicated is that even though there is sadness and death, life goes on. Look Who’s Talking has an epilogue that shows the birth of the baby hero’s little sister nine months after the main plot has been resolved.  Stories that show a group of characters at a formative or critical period, like American Graffiti or war movies such as Glory or The Dirty Dozen, may end with a short segment that tells how the characters died, progressed in life, or were remembered. A League of Their Own has an extensive epilogue in which an aging woman ballplayer, having remembered her career in flashback for the main body of the film, visits the Baseball Hall of Fame and sees many of her teammates.  The fates of the players are revealed and the surviving women, now in their sixties, stage a game to show that they still know how to play ball.  Their spirit is the Elixir that revives the hero and the audience.

These have been a few of the purposes and functions of Return. There are also pitfalls to avoid Returning with the Elixir.

PITFALS OF THE RETURN

It’s easy to blow it in the Return. Many stories fall apart in the final moments.  The Return is too abrupt, prolonged, unfocused, unsurprising, or unsatisfying.  The mood or chain of thought the author has created just evaporates and the whole effort is wasted.  The Return may also be too ambiguous.  Many people failed the twist ending of Basic Instinct for failing to resolve uncertainty about a woman’s guilt.

UNRESOLVED SUBPLOTS

Another pitfall is that writers fail to bring all the elements together at the Return. It’s common for writers today to leave subplot threads dangling.  Perhaps in the furry to finish and deal with the main characters, the fates of secondary characters and ideas are forgotten about, even though they may be extremely interesting to the audience.  Older films tend to be more complete and satisfying because the creators took time to work out every subplot.  Character actors could be counted on to do their bit somewhere at the beginning, the middle, and the end.  A rule of thumb: Subplots should have at least three “beats” or scenes distributed throughout the story, one in each act. All the subplots should be acknowledged or resolved in the Return.  Each character should come away with some variety of Elixir or learning.

TOO MANY ENDINGS

On the other hand, the Return should not seem laboured or repetitive. Another good rule of thumb for the Return phase is to operate on the KISS system, that is: Keep It Simple, Stupid. Many stories fail because they have too many endings.  The audience senses the story is over but the writer, perhaps unable to choose the right ending, tries several.  This tends to frustrate an audience, dissipating the energy the writer has created.  People want to know the story’s definitively over so they can quickly get up and leave the theatre or finish the book with a powerful charge of emotion.  An overly ambitious film like Lord Jim, trying to take on a dense novel, can exhaust an audience with climaxes and endings that seem to go on forever.

An extreme example of keeping it simple might be the karate match that forms the climax of The Karate Kid.  When the last kick is delivered and the hero wins, the credits roll immediately in a burst of final theme music.  There is almost no denouement.  We know the kid is bearing the Elixir of lessons learned well in his training.

ABRUPT ENDINGS

A Return can seem too abrupt, giving the sense the writer has quit too soon after the climax. A story tends to feel incomplete unless a certain emotional space is devoted to bidding farewell to the characters and drawing some conclusions.  An abrupt Return is like someone hanging up the phone without saying goodbye, or a pilot bailing out without bringing the plane in for a landing.

FOCUS

A Return may feel out of focus if the dramatic question, raised in Act One and tested in Act Two, are not answered now. Writers may have failed to pose the right questions in the first place.  Without realizing it, a writer may have shifted the theme.  A tale that started out as a love story may have turned into an expose of government corruption.  The writer has lost the thread.  The story will not seem focused unless the circle is closed by Returning to the original themes.

PUNCTUATION

The final function of Return is to conclude the story decisively. The story should end with the emotional equivalent of a punctuation mark.  A story, like a sentence, can end in only four ways: with a period, an exclamation point [definitive], a question mark, or an ellipsis (the three or four little dots that indicate your thoughts have just trailed off vaguely.  Example: Do you want to go now, or…).

The needs of your story and your attitude may dictate ending with the feeling of a period, an image or line of dialogue flatly making a declarative statement: “Life goes on”. “Love conquers all.”  “Good triumphs over evil”.  “That’s the way life is”.  “There’s no place like home.”

An ending can give the effect of an exclamation point if the intent of the work is to stir action or create alarm. Science fiction and horror films may end on a note of “We are not alone!”  or “Repent or perish!”  Stories of social awareness may end with a passionate tone of “Never again!” or “Rise up and throw off chains of oppression!” or “Something must be done!”

In a more open-ended approach to structure, you may want to end with the effect of a question mark, and the feeling that uncertainties remain. The final image may pose a question such as “Will the hero Return with the Elixir or will it be forgotten?”  An open-ended story may also trail off with the feeling of an ellipsis.  Unspoken questions may linger [effect] in the air or conflicts may remain unresolved with endings that suggest doubt or ambiguity: “The hero can’t decide between two women, and therefore…” or “Love and art are irreconcilable, so…” or “Life goes on…and on… and on…” or “She proved she’s not a killer, but…”

One way or another, the very ending of a story should announce that it’s all over – like the Warner Bros. Cartoon signature line “That’s all, folks”. Oral storytellers, in addition to using formulas like “… and they lived happily ever after,” will sometimes end folktales with a ritual statement like “I’m done, that’s that, and who’ll ease my dry throat with a drink?”  Sometimes a final image, such as the hero riding off into the sunset, can sum up the story’s theme in a visual metaphor and let the audience know it’s over.  The final image of Unforgiven, a shot of Clint Eastwood’s character leaving his wife’s grave and returning to his house, signals the end of the journey and sums up the story’s theme.

 

THE WIZARD OF OZ

Dorothy’s Return begins with saying goodbye to her Allies and acknowledging the Elixirs of love, courage, and common sense she has gained from them. Then, tapping her heels and chanting “There’s no place like home,” she wishes herself back to Kansas where she started.

Back home in the Ordinary World, back to black and white, Dorothy wakes up in bed with a compress on her head. The Return is ambiguous: Was the trip to Oz “real,” or was it the dream of a girl with a concussion?  In story terms, however, it doesn’t matter; the journey was real to Dorothy.

She recognizes the people around her as characters from Oz. But her perceptions of them have changed as a result of her experience in the Special World.  She remembers that some of it was horrible, some beautiful, but she focuses on what she’s learned – there’s no place like home.

Dorothy’s declaration that she will never leave home again is not meant to be taken literally. It’s not this little frame house in Kansas to which she refers, but her own soul.  She is a fully integrated person in possession of her best qualities, in control of the worst, and in touch with the positive forms of masculine and feminine energy within her.  She has incorporated every lesson she has learned from every being along the road.  She is finally happy in her own skin and will feel at home no matter where she is.  The Elixir she brings back is this new idea of home, a new concept of her Self.

 ****

And so the Hero’s Journey ends, or at least rests for awhile, for the journey of life and the adventure of story never really end. The hero and the audience bring back the Elixir from the current adventure, but the quest to integrate the lessons goes on.  It’s for each of us to say what the Elixir is – wisdom, experience, money, love, fame, or the thrill of a lifetime.  But a good story, like a good journey, leaves us with an Elixir that changes us, makes us more aware, more alive more human, more whole, more a part of everything that is.  The circle of the Hero’s Journey is complete.

 

QUESTIONING THE JOURNEY

  1. What is the Elixir of Basic Instinct? Big? City Slickers? Fatal Attraction? Dances with Wolves?
  2. What is the Elixir your hero brings back from the experience? Is it kept to herself or is it shared?
  3. Does your story go on too long after the main event or climax is over? What would be the effect of simply cutting it off after the climax? How much denouement do you need to satisfy the audience?
  4. In what ways has the hero gradually taken more responsibility in the course of the story? Is the Return a point of taking greatest responsibility?
  5. Who is the hero of the story now? Has your story changed heroes, or have characters risen to be heroes? Who turned out to be a disappointment? Are there any surprises in the final outcome?
  6. Is your story worth telling? Has enough been learned to make the effort worthwhile?
  7. Where are you in your own Hero’s Journey? What is the Elixir you hope to bring back?

 

 

CRITICISING GOD’S LEADERS

It is dangerous to criticise God’s leaders. Consider the consequences for these men and women.

Person/Situation:  Miriam: Mocked Moses because he had a Cushite wife

Result:  Stricken with leprosy

Reference:  Numbers 12

 

Person/Situation:  Korah and followers: Led the people of Israel to rebel against Moses’ leadership

Result:  Swallowed by the earth

Reference:  Numbers 16

 

Person/Situation:  Michal: Despised David because he danced before the Lord

Result:  Remained childless

Reference:  2 Samuel 6

 

Person/Situation:  Shimei: Cursed and threw stones at David

Result:  Executed at Solomon’s order

Reference:  2 Samuel 16 ;  1 Kings 2

 

Person/Situation:  Youths: Mocked Elisha and laughed at his baldness

Result:  Killed by bears

Reference:  2 Kings 2

 

Person/Situation:  Sanballat and Tobiah: Spread rumours and lies to stop the building of Jerusalem’s walls

Result:  Frightened and humiliated

Reference:  Nehemiah 2, 4, 6

 

Person/Situation:  Hananiah: Contradicted Jeremiah’s prophecies with false predictions

Result:  Died two months later

Reference:  Jeremiah 28

 

Person/Situation:  Bar-Jesus, a sorcerer: Lied about Paul in an attempt to turn the proconsul against him

Result:  Stricken with blindness

Reference:  Acts 13

 

GOD USES COMMON PEOPLE

God uses all sorts of people to do his work – – like you and me!

Person Known as Task Reference
JACOB A deceiver To “father” the Israelite nation Genesis 27
JOSEPH A slave To save his family Genesis 39ff
MOSES Shepherd in exile (and murderer) To lead Israel out of bondage to the promised land Exodus 3
GIDEON A farmer To deliver Israel from Midian Judges 6:11
JEPHTHAH Son of a prostitute To deliver Israel from the Ammonites Judges 11:1
HANNAH A housewife To be the mother of Samuel 1 Samuel 1
DAVID A shepherd boy and last-born of the family To be Israel’s greatest king 1 Samuel 16
EZRA A scribe To lead the return to Judah and to write some of the Bible Ezra, Nehemiah
ESTHER A slave girl To save her people from massacre Esther
MARY A peasant girl To be the mother of Christ Luke 1:27-38
MATTHEW A tax collector To be an apostle and Gospel writer Matthew 9:9
LUKE A Greek physician To be a companion of Paul and a Gospel writer Colossians 4:14
PETER A fisherman To be an apostle, a leader of the early church, and a writer of two New Testament letters Matthew 4:18-20